Adam Freedman Home Elated By Details About the Author Appearances Travel and humor writing
|
Letter from America
Casual look that doesn't suit everybody Adam Freedman Thursday September 21, 2000 The Guardian Every morning as I walk up Third Avenue, clutching a coffee and bagel, I look out for him. I don't know his name, but he is some sort of high-powered executive. A man of regular habits, he smokes his morning cigar on the pavement in front of the office building we share. From the first sight, what struck me was the image he projected. He had a puffy Donald-Trump pompadour of hair, grey flannel suit and a massive Rolex watch, and smoked a torpedo-sized cigar. The
man was a New York Tycoon. The sort of man I might grow up to be if only I had
a head for business. Some weeks ago the Tycoon changed. Instead of a grey
flannel suit he now wears a rather improbable pair of designer jeans and a
stiffly pressed polo shirt. The man is still there, but the Tycoon is dead - a
victim of New York's recent obsession with "business casual" dress. It all
happened so quickly. For as long as anyone can remember, New York men wore
suits and ties to work; women the equivalent. The only exception was
"casual Fridays": the tacit understanding that on Fridays during the
summer one could go "casual", so as to make a faster escape to the
beaches of the Hamptons. Somewhere
- maybe in the smoke-filled rooms of the KKnickerbocker Club - there was a
collective decision to raise the stakes. Casual Friday now became Casual
Summer. And so, like thousands, if not millions of New Yorkers I arrived at
work one day to find a memo on my desk to the effect that suits and ties would
be optional from Memorial Day (May 29) to Labour Day (September 4). Like all
American traditions this one was "effective immediately". The
next morning, as I thought about what to wear, I could not believe that my
employer, a large law firm, would truly embrace this casual policy. And even if
it did, could I, a senior associate angling to become a partner, afford to
project a less professional image? I put
on a suit. The
first hint that I had underestimated the power of Casual Summer was the Tycoon.
There he was with his cigar, a shadow of his former self. His ample belly,
which had once been so tastefully swathed in worsted wool, was now hanging over
an alligator skin belt. Arriving
at my office I ran into one of the senior partners, dressed in a dark green
polo shirt and khaki trousers. "What's with the suit?" he cried.
"Didn't you get the memo?" How to
save face? Not to have read or understood the Casual Summer memo would have
been a terrible sin for a prospective partner. "I... I just prefer wearing
a suit." "In
this weather? You must be shviting in all that!" Yes,
now that he mentioned it, I was beginning to sweat a little. At this point
another partner approached, also dressed in dark green polo shirt and khaki
trousers. "Hey, get this," said the first partner to the second.
"He prefers wearing a suit!" Casual
Summer was a hit from the start. So much so, that pressure began to build in
favour of dispensing with suits and ties altogether. After all, the argument
went, if dot.com millionaires can wear trainers, why can't we? The fact that
millionaires can do all sorts of things that we can't never seems to factor
into the equation. The new battle cry was: Year-Round Casual. The
boys at the Knickerbocker Club hadn't figured on this development. One of the
eternal truths of American culture is that the East Coast is uptight, the West
Coast is laid-back. It turns out that casual dress had not erased that distinction.
As the Year-Round movement gained steam New York firms were still struggling to
define the rules of Casual Summer. Personnel offices throughout Manhattan
issued complex guidelines describing a look that was not merely
"casual", but "business casual". My
firm now had a multi-page memo explaining the distinctions between business
casual (weekday version) and business casual (late-night version) and business
casual (weekend version). Shirts must have collars. It would be nice if
trousers were pressed. "Sports-related attire" was not acceptable.
Women must refrain from "bare midriffs" and "micro-mini"
skirts. Before
the summer was out Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft, a 200-year-old law firm,
announced that it was going to year-round casual dress. That was it. The
floodgates were open. But New York-style neurosis asserted itself: would the
policy be misinterpreted? So Cadwalader invited Polo Ralph Lauren, along with
Esquire magazine, to hold a fashion seminar for its attorneys and staff. And
now Labour Day has passed, and my firm has adopted Year-Round Casual. The
personnel office has just issued a memo explaining the fine distinctions
between business casual (summer version) and business casual (autumn to spring
version). Yet people still ask me why I find it simpler to continue as I always
have, wearing a suit and tie to work. I
passed the Tycoon again on my way to the office. As he stood there, smoking in
his jeans and earth-tone shirt he seemed to be trembling. Perhaps it was just
the touch of autumn in the air. |
Learning to Tango Weekend Warriors First Person Global: France Casual Look That Doesn't Suit Everybody Latinese Dumb Laws for Idiots (book review) |